Reducing Unrecognized Transaction Calls Through Contextual Information

A redesign of the transaction list and detail experience — using Ethoca's merchant data to give users the context to identify charges on their own.
  • Company
  • Banamex
  • Role
  • Sr. Product Designer
  • Devices
  • Mobile App (iOS, Android)
  • Duration
  • 6 months

OVERVIEW

Banamex serves 20 million users.
Their bill payment flow hadn't kept up.

When customers see a string like "MXPAGO*8472 CDMX" in their banking app, the instinctive reaction is to call customer support. This project explored how enriching transaction data with merchant logos, clean names, spend categories, location context and digital receipts could help users confidently identify their own purchases — and dramatically reduce unnecessary calls to the Customer Attention Center (CAT).

Working with data from Ethoca's merchant network, we redesigned both the transaction list and the transaction detail screen to surface the right information at the right moment.

PROBLEMS

Three compounding problems, one broken experience.

🔤

Unreadable transaction strings:

Raw processor references like "MXPAGO*8472 CDMX" are meaningless to the average user — impossible to connect to a real-world purchase without context.

📞

Support volume driven by confusion, not fraud:

A quarter of all CAT calls about unrecognized charges ended in the user realizing it was a purchase they had made — meaning the product was generating its own support load.

📊

No visual hierarchy or context in the transaction view:

The transaction list offered no logos, no categories, no location — just amounts and strings. Users had no self-service path to resolve doubt without calling.

SOLUTION

Key features create one coherent experience.

We introduced features built around a single goal: make bill payments faster, clearer, and less error-prone.

One-time payment

Real brand logos replace generic icons — enabling instant visual recognition for familiar brands for the transaction list and transaction detail.

QR / Barcode scanning

Friendly user commerce names replace cryptic processor strings like "MXPAGO*847" to Amazon.com

Biller catalog with smart search

Friendly user commerce names replace cryptic processor strings like "MXPAGO*847" to Amazon.com

Saved services hub

Shown selectively where it aids recognition — framed to avoid a surveillance feel given local sociocultural context.

Due today
Urgent badge state

3 days left
Push notification sent

7+ days left
Upcoming reminder

DESIGN PROCESS

From research to a shipped product


Discovery

Ideation

Definition

Design

Prototype + Testing

Hand-Off
· User research
· Stakeholder interviews
· Benchmarking
· Heuristics
· HMW sessions
· Feature mapping
· Concept sketches
· Low-fi prototype
· Stakeholder validation
· MVP scoping
· IA
· Components
· High-fidelity
· Prototyping
· Card sorting
· Usability testing
· Iteration
· Dev follow-up
· QA
· Launch war room

Research and analysis

Ideation – How might we...?

Discovery insights were reframed as HMW questions to open up the solution space before any screen was drawn.
H M W
Reduce human error while entering the biller's reference number?
H M W
Restructure the flow for a one-payment experience?
H M W
Create a functional and intuitive biller search for 70+ services?
H M W
Help users not forget their payment due dates?
H M W
Give users quicker access to saved services?
H M W
Help users find their reference number on their receipt?

Definition – Information Architecture

Redundant screens were removed and the flow restructured around two clear paths: one-time payment and saved services.

Testing – Card Sorting + Usability

Open and closed card sorting (research tool Maze) established the 9-chip catalog hierarchy.

HAND - OFF

The work doesn't stop at handoff

After several iterations and some last minute (very impactful changes to perfectly align with all stakeholders) I handed-off the project and ran a developer walkthrough, documented every user action in an analytics tagging table, joined engineering standups to resolve edge cases in real time, reviewed demo builds for design fidelity, and joined the launch war room on ship day.

Shipping at Banamex's scale means the designer stays in the loop until the feature is live and working.

IMPACT

Real numbers, real money, real people

50%
Reduction in interaction cost,
from 12 clicks to 6
410K
Successful transactions
in the first 3 months
$295M
MXN processed through
the redesigned flow
<30s
Time to pay a saved service,
just three taps

LEARNINGS

What I learned building this

🔌
API constraints shaped design decisions

Several features were cut because the APIs weren't ready. The lesson: design ambitiously, but document constraints clearly so deprioritized ideas can ship later — and most of them did.

🧩
Early cross-functional buy-in changes everything

Bringing product, engineering, and legal in from the start — not just at review gates — meant fewer late surprises and faster decisions when priorities shifted.

💬
Feedback culture is a design tool

Creating consistent space for peers and managers to critique openly led to stronger iteration.

📏
The handoff is part of the design

The gap between a polished prototype and a pixel-accurate shipped product is real. Staying involved through standups, demos, and the launch war room is what closes it.

Reducing Unrecognized Transaction Calls Through Contextual Information

A redesign of the transaction list and detail experience — using Ethoca's merchant data to give users the context to identify charges on their own.
  • Year
  • Banamex
  • Role
  • Sr. Product Designer
  • Devices
  • Mobile App (iOS, Android)
  • Design tools
  • 6 months

OVERVIEW

A separation from Citibank.
A chance to rebuild everything.

When customers see a string like "MXPAGO*8472 CDMX" in their banking app, the instinctive reaction is to call customer support. This project explored how enriching transaction data with merchant logos, clean names, spend categories, location context and digital receipts could help users confidently identify their own purchases — and dramatically reduce unnecessary calls to the Customer Attention Center (CAT).

Working with data from Ethoca's merchant network, we redesigned both the transaction list and the transaction detail screen to surface the right information at the right moment.

PROBLEMS

Three problems that had to be solved before design could begin.

🔤

Unreadable transaction strings:

Raw processor references like "MXPAGO*8472 CDMX" are meaningless to the average user — impossible to connect to a real-world purchase without context.

📞

Support volume driven by confusion, not fraud:

A quarter of all CAT calls about unrecognized charges ended in the user realizing it was a purchase they had made — meaning the product was generating its own support load.

📊

No visual hierarchy or context in the transaction view:

The transaction list offered no logos, no categories, no location — just amounts and strings. Users had no self-service path to resolve doubt without calling.

SOLUTION

A new design system. A fully rebranded product.

Before & after — the same product, rebuilt

01 · Login

Before
After

The entry point to the new brand — the first screen millions of users see. Redesigned to reflect Banamex's new visual identity from the first interaction.

02 · Dashboard

Before
After

The command centre of BancaNet, rebuilt with the new component library to surface account information clearly and consistently across all user types.

03 · Account Detail

Before
After

A complete reimagining of how users view and manage their accounts — modernised visual hierarchy, updated data display patterns, and full design system compliance.

04 · Transfers & payments

Before
After

One of the highest-traffic flows in BancaNet — redesigned for clarity and speed while navigating the technical constraints of legacy transaction infrastructure.

05 · Investments

Before
After

A data-dense feature requiring careful information hierarchy to remain accessible to non-expert users under the new visual system.

06 · Settings & logout

Before
After

Often overlooked, but critical to brand consistency — every corner of BancaNet needed to reflect the new identity, including configuration and session flows.

DESIGN PROCESS

Eight months of parallel workstreams.


Documentation

Design System

UI Iteration

Screen Recration

Hand-off

Launch
· UX audit
· Feature map
· Prioritisation
· Batch planning
· Token architecture
· Atomic components
· Web library
· Strategic screens
· Templates
· Approval process
· 7-designer team
· 200+ screens + Responsiveness
· Staged batches
· Dev follow-up
· QA sessions
· Pre-prod review
· Fix Inconsistencies
· Ship day

Before designing anything, the product had to be found.

We redesigned the transaction experience using Ethoca's merchant data network to surface contextual information at both list and detail level. The solution was layered across three data availability states, ensuring it degraded gracefully for merchants outside the Ethoca network — never showing an empty or broken state.

IMPACT ↑
Quick wins
Strategic projects
Fill-ins
Reconsider
EFFORT →

Building the Roseta Design System for web

UI iteration & design approval

Screen recreation at scale

Staged handoff & developer follow-up

Launch

IMPACT

On schedule. At scale. Built to last.

5
Web applications rebranded with the Roseta Design System
40+
User flows redesigned across BancaNet
172+
New components — now the standard for all future web development
40%
Faster screen recreation through structured templates and system

DESIGN PROCESS

What leading this project taught me.

🔌
Invest upfront in stakeholder alignment

The approval process involved four distinct stakeholder groups with different priorities. Time spent aligning them early — through the right channels, with the right people in the room — paid back in faster decisions later.

🧩
Documentation is a design deliverable

Starting from nothing taught me that a living source of truth is as important as the screens themselves. The audit I built from scratch became the foundation the entire project ran on.

💬
Done is better than perfect — with evidence

Not everything could be resolved before launch. Accepting that — while documenting what remained — meant the team shipped on time and the inconsistencies file gave engineering a clear, prioritised path forward.

📏
Constraints are creative inputs

Legacy systems forced closer collaboration with developers than a greenfield project would have. That friction produced a more grounded, technically realistic design system — one that actually shipped.

Reducing Unrecognized Transaction Calls Through Contextual Information

A redesign of the transaction list and detail experience — using Ethoca's merchant data to give users the context to identify charges on their own.
  • Company
  • Banamex
  • Role
  • Sr. Product Designer
  • Devices
  • Mobile App (iOS, Android)
  • Duration
  • 6 months

OVERVIEW

Millions of transactions.
One broken moment: "I don't recognize this charge."

When customers see a string like "MXPAGO*8472 CDMX" in their banking app, the instinctive reaction is to call customer support. This project explored how enriching transaction data with merchant logos, clean names, spend categories, location context and digital receipts could help users confidently identify their own purchases — and dramatically reduce unnecessary calls to the Customer Attention Center (CAT).

Working with data from Ethoca's merchant network, we redesigned both the transaction list and the transaction detail screen to surface the right information at the right moment.

PROBLEMS

Three compounding problems,
one overloaded support team.

🔤

Unreadable transaction strings:

Raw processor references like "MXPAGO*8472 CDMX" are meaningless to the average user — impossible to connect to a real-world purchase without context.

📞

Support volume driven by confusion, not fraud:

A quarter of all CAT calls about unrecognized charges ended in the user realizing it was a purchase they had made — meaning the product was generating its own support load.

📊

No visual hierarchy or context in the transaction view:

The transaction list offered no logos, no categories, no location — just amounts and strings. Users had no self-service path to resolve doubt without calling.

In other words...

77%

of customers struggle to identify their own transactions in the app.

73%

choose to call the CAT when unsure about a charge.

1 in 4

CAT calls about unrecognized charges end in confusion — not actual fraud.

Current state when the project kicked off — no merchant context, no visual anchors, no way to self-resolve.

SOLUTION

Information that turns a mystery charge,
into a recognizable purchase.

We redesigned the transaction experience using Ethoca's merchant data network to surface contextual information at both list and detail level. The solution was layered across three data availability states, ensuring it degraded gracefully for merchants outside the Ethoca network — never showing an empty or broken state.

1️⃣ Merchant Logo

Real brand logos replace generic icons — enabling instant visual recognition for familiar brands for the transaction list and transaction detail.

2️⃣ Clean Merchant Name

Friendly user commerce names replace cryptic processor strings like "MXPAGO*847" to Amazon.com

3️⃣ Spend Category

Auto-assigned categories (Food, Transport, Subscriptions) give users a cognitive anchor when the name alone isn't enough.

4️⃣ Location

Shown selectively where it aids recognition — framed to avoid a surveillance feel given local sociocultural context.

5️⃣ Digital Receipt

Itemized transaction detail for Ethoca-enrolled merchants — replicating the physical receipt experience inside apps and even physical receits.

DESIGN PROCESS

From a confusing processor string to
a recognized purchase — in five steps.

  • Benchmark — We looked everywhere before drawing anything

    We mapped how transaction data was presented across traditional banking apps, international neobanks, and non-banking platforms with strong receipt experiences.

    1. · Traditional domestic banks provided almost no merchant context.
    2. · International digital wallets like Apple Pay were richer — but surfacing precise location introduced a cultural nuance: in our market, it could feel intrusive rather than helpful.
    3. · Apps like Rappi and Amazon showed how a receipt-style view builds confidence without creating anxiety.
  • Workshop — Five teams. One whiteboard. The first sketches.

    We brought together stakeholders from business, acquisition, product, design, and technology teams in a cross-functional Design Thinking oriented workshop. Using sticky notes, iPad sketches, paper wireframes, and dot-voting, teams aligned on which data elements were both technically viable and user-valuable, bringing to the table ideas, concerns, agurments and counter-aguments on how to build an experience that benefits the bank and, of course, the user.  

    The session produced the first rough sketches of an enriched transaction card — and surfaced critical constraints around what Ethoca's merchant data network could and couldn't provide at launch.

  • Use cases — Not all transactions are equal. The design had to handle all of them.

    Three distinct use cases shaped the new feature:

  • User Testing — We put two versions in front of users. The data told us which won.

    We ran moderated user testing sessions with three core objectives:

    🔀   A/B testing

    Baseline (raw string) vs. enriched design, measuring recognition speed and user confidence
    👁️   Behavioral observation

    Understanding what actions users take when they genuinely can't identify a charge
    📝   Content validation

    Testing whether label copy ("Merchant", "Establishment", "Commerce") resonated or created new confusion

MVP

We designed six features. Four made it to launch.

The MVP successfully introduced merchant logos, clean commerce names, merchant contact information, and a redesigned transaction list and detail views — giving users the context to recognize their own purchases without picking up the phone. A real step forward from screens that previously showed nothing but a processor string.

Never the less, the design package was larger, it included three additional features — transaction location, a digital receipt, and spend categories. None of them made it to launch. That's just how shipping works sometimes. The features that didn't make it aren't failures — they're an honest record of how the project evolved and what the team learned along the way.

What didn't ship?
Three features designed.
Three different reasons they didn't launch.

📍 Transaction location
Cut from roadmap

Research surfaced a security concern specific to our market: users worried that location history could expose their movement patterns if their phone was stolen. Unlike international neobanks where this data is standard, it created anxiety rather than confidence. It was removed from the roadmap entirely — the concern wasn't one design iteration could resolve.

🧾 Digital Receipt
Deprioritized — API constraints

During development, the team discovered the Ethoca API had more significant constraints than initially scoped — making itemized receipt data unavailable across all merchant types. With a fixed launch date and limited engineering headcount, a partial solution wasn't viable. The feature was deprioritized with no formal future commitment made at the time.

📂 Spend categories
Dropped — data partner taxonomy

When the Ethoca team shared their category taxonomy, the labels were either too technical for everyday users or exceeded the chip component's character limit. Remapping them to a simpler set would have required additional coordination with the data partner — scope the team couldn't absorb before launch. The feature was dropped rather than ship a confusing or truncated version.

IMPACT

Fewer calls. More confidence.
Support reserved for real problems.

↓ Fewer confusion-driven CAT calls
Contextual merchant data gave users the information to identify charges on their own — eliminating the most preventable source of support volume.
↑ Higher transaction recognition rate
Significantly improved identification in A/B testing compared to the raw-string baseline — users could match transactions to purchases at a glance.
↑ Greater user confidence
Users reported higher peace of mind when reviewing account activity with logos and clean merchant names visible alongside their charges.
→ Real disputes finally surfaced
With confusion filtered out, support contacts increasingly represent genuine fraud cases — improving resolution quality across the board.

LEARNINGS

What I learned building this

🗺️
Sociocultural context is a design constraint

Features that feel neutral in one market can feel intrusive in another. International benchmarks were valuable references — but not templates. Location data that builds trust for a Revolut user raised security concerns for ours. Design has to account for what "normal" means to the specific user, not the general pattern.

🔀
Design for data variability, not just the ideal state

The most important design decision wasn't the enriched view — it was the fallback. When Ethoca data isn't available, the experience still has to feel intentional. Designing the degraded states with the same care as the hero states is what makes a system feel polished at scale.

🧩
Early cross-functional buy-in changes everything

Bringing product, engineering, and external partners in from the workshop stage — not just at review gates — meant fewer surprises when the Ethoca data coverage constraints emerged. Problems discovered together get solved faster.

⌨️
Content is part of the interaction design

Whether to label a merchant as "Commerce", "Merchant", or "Establishment" wasn't a copywriting detail — it was a usability question. The A/B testing revealed that label choice materially affected how users interpreted and trusted the information on screen.

UP